The evolution of transformer models: From BERT to modern LLMs

The transformer architecture has fundamentally reshaped natural language processing and artificial intelligence at large. Since its introduction in 2017, this revolutionary approach has spawned an entire ecosystem of increasingly powerful models that have progressively pushed the boundaries of what’s possible in machine learning. This article traces the remarkable evolution of transformer models from BERT to today’s sophisticated large language models (LLMs), exploring the key innovations, architectural developments, and conceptual breakthroughs that have defined this rapidly advancing field.

The foundation: “Attention is all you need”

The transformer journey began with the landmark 2017 paper by Vaswani et al., “Attention is All You Need,” which introduced a novel architecture that would fundamentally change the landscape of natural language processing. Before transformers, recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and their variants like Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks dominated the field. These sequential models processed text one token at a time, creating two significant limitations:

  1. They couldn’t easily capture long-range dependencies in text
  2. They couldn’t be parallelized effectively, making training slow and computationally expensive

The transformer architecture solved both problems by introducing the self-attention mechanism, which allows the model to weigh the importance of different words in a sequence regardless of their distance from each other. This made it possible to process all tokens in a sequence simultaneously rather than sequentially, enabling massive parallelization and more effective capture of contextual relationships.

The original transformer consisted of both encoder and decoder components, with the encoder processing the input sequence and the decoder generating the output sequence. This architecture was initially designed for machine translation but would soon be adapted for a wide range of NLP tasks.

BERT: Bidirectional encoding enters the scene

In 2018, Google researchers introduced BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers), which represented the first major evolution of the transformer architecture. BERT made two critical innovations:

  1. Bidirectional context: Unlike previous models that processed text from left to right, BERT analyzed text bidirectionally, allowing it to understand context from both directions.
  2. Pre-training and fine-tuning paradigm: BERT established the now-standard approach of pre-training a model on vast amounts of unlabeled text data and then fine-tuning it for specific downstream tasks.

BERT’s pre-training involved two novel tasks:

  • Masked Language Modeling (MLM): Randomly masking words in a sentence and training the model to predict them based on context.
  • Next Sentence Prediction (NSP): Training the model to determine whether two sentences naturally follow each other.

BERT demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide range of NLP benchmarks, outperforming previous state-of-the-art models by significant margins. This success catalyzed an explosion of research into transformer-based models.

The original BERT came in two sizes:

  • BERT-Base: 110 million parameters
  • BERT-Large: 340 million parameters

These parameter counts, which seemed massive at the time, would soon be dwarfed by subsequent models.

The diversification phase: RoBERTa, ALBERT, and DistilBERT

Following BERT’s success, researchers began exploring various modifications and optimizations to the architecture, leading to a diverse family of BERT variants:

RoBERTa: Robustly optimized BERT

In 2019, Facebook AI (now Meta AI) introduced RoBERTa, which demonstrated that BERT was significantly undertrained. RoBERTa made several key modifications:

  • Removed the Next Sentence Prediction objective
  • Used dynamic masking patterns for more robust training
  • Trained on larger batches and more data
  • Extended training time

These seemingly simple optimizations led to substantial performance improvements, highlighting the importance of training methodology alongside architectural innovation.

ALBERT: A lite BERT

Also in 2019, researchers introduced ALBERT, which focused on creating more parameter-efficient versions of BERT through:

  • Parameter sharing across layers
  • Factorized embedding parameterization
  • Inter-sentence coherence loss instead of NSP

ALBERT achieved state-of-the-art results with significantly fewer parameters, demonstrating that architectural efficiency could be as important as scale.

DistilBERT: Distilled BERT

Hugging Face researchers created DistilBERT using knowledge distillation to create a smaller, faster version of BERT that retained 97% of its performance while using only 40% of the parameters and running 60% faster.

These models represented important explorations in making transformer architectures more efficient, a research direction that remains crucial even as models have grown dramatically in size.

The GPT family: Decoder-focused evolution

While BERT and its variants focused on using the encoder portion of the transformer architecture, OpenAI explored the decoder-only approach with its GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) series:

GPT-1: Initial explorations

Released in 2018, the original GPT demonstrated the effectiveness of transformer decoders for generative tasks. With 117 million parameters, it was comparable in size to BERT-Base but utilized a unidirectional approach, processing text from left to right.

GPT-2: Scaling begins

In 2019, GPT-2 scaled up the architecture to 1.5 billion parameters and was trained on a more diverse dataset. This scaling led to surprisingly emergent capabilities, including the ability to generate coherent, long-form text and perform simple reasoning tasks without specific fine-tuning.

OpenAI’s staged release of GPT-2 due to concerns about potential misuse marked an important moment in AI ethics discussions.

GPT-3: The scaling hypothesis validated

In 2020, OpenAI released GPT-3, which represented a massive leap in scale with 175 billion parameters. This 100x increase in size led to remarkable emergent capabilities, including:

  • Few-shot learning, where the model could perform new tasks given just a few examples
  • More sophisticated reasoning abilities
  • Improved code generation
  • Better performance across a wide range of tasks without task-specific fine-tuning

GPT-3 provided strong evidence for the “scaling hypothesis”—the idea that many capabilities in language models emerge naturally from scaling up model size, data, and compute.

T5 and the encoder-decoder renaissance

In late 2019, Google introduced T5 (Text-to-Text Transfer Transformer), which reframed all NLP tasks as text-to-text problems. T5 utilized both encoder and decoder components of the original transformer architecture and demonstrated that a single model could be trained to perform multiple NLP tasks by formulating each task as a text generation problem.

T5 came in various sizes, with the largest (T5-11B) containing 11 billion parameters. Its unified approach to diverse NLP tasks represented an important conceptual evolution in how researchers thought about language models.

Efficiency innovations: Transformers get leaner

As models grew larger, researchers also focused on making transformer architectures more efficient:

Reformer (2020)

The Reformer introduced two key optimizations:

  • Locality-sensitive hashing to reduce the complexity of attention computation
  • Reversible residual layers to save memory during training

Performer (2020)

The Performer utilized Fast Attention Via Positive Orthogonal Random Features (FAVOR+) to approximate attention calculations, reducing computational complexity from quadratic to linear.

Linformer (2020)

Linformer used a low-rank approximation of the self-attention matrix to reduce complexity, making it possible to process much longer sequences efficiently.

These efficiency-focused models demonstrated that transformer architectures could be optimized for different constraints, not just scaled up indiscriminately.

Multimodal transformers: Beyond text

Around 2021, researchers began extending transformer architectures to handle multiple modalities simultaneously:

CLIP (Contrastive Language-Image Pre-training)

Introduced by OpenAI in 2021, CLIP trained transformers on image-text pairs, enabling zero-shot classification of images based on natural language descriptions.

DALL-E

Also from OpenAI, DALL-E applied transformers to generate images from text descriptions, demonstrating the architecture’s flexibility beyond text processing.

ViT (Vision Transformer)

Google’s Vision Transformer applied the transformer architecture directly to image processing by treating images as sequences of patches, achieving competitive results with convolutional neural networks.

These multimodal applications demonstrated the transformer’s versatility as a general-purpose architecture for various AI tasks.

The emergence of LLMs: 2022-2024

The pace of innovation accelerated dramatically from 2022 through 2024, with several key developments defining the modern era of Large Language Models:

Chinchilla and the optimal scaling laws

In 2022, DeepMind’s Chinchilla model demonstrated that many previous models were significantly undertrained. The Chinchilla paper established new scaling laws suggesting that for optimal performance, the amount of training data should scale linearly with model size. This insight led to more efficient training regimes for subsequent models.

PaLM: Pathways Language Model

Google’s 540-billion-parameter PaLM model demonstrated breakthrough capabilities in reasoning, code generation, and multilingual tasks. Its Pathways system allowed training on thousands of accelerator chips in parallel, representing a significant advance in training infrastructure.

Instruction tuning and alignment

Models like InstructGPT and later Anthropic’s Claude series pioneered more sophisticated approaches to aligning models with human preferences through techniques like:

  • Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF)
  • Constitutional AI approaches
  • Detailed preference modeling

These alignment techniques became crucial as models grew more capable and potentially more dangerous if misaligned.

GPT-4: Multimodal capabilities mature

OpenAI’s GPT-4, released in March 2023, introduced sophisticated multimodal capabilities, processing both text and images in a unified framework. With an estimated 1.76 trillion parameters (though the exact size remains undisclosed), GPT-4 demonstrated near-human performance on various professional and academic benchmarks.

Mixture of Experts (MoE) architecture

Models like Google’s Gemini Ultra and potentially GPT-4 incorporated Mixture of Experts architectures, where only a subset of the network is activated for any given input. This approach allows for much larger total parameter counts while keeping computational requirements manageable.

Open-weight models: Llama, Mistral, and beyond

Meta’s release of the Llama model family and later models from Mistral AI democratized access to powerful transformer-based LLMs. These open-weight models enabled broader experimentation and adaptation across the AI community.

The long-context revolution

Models like Claude 2 and later GPT-4 Turbo extended context windows from a few thousand tokens to over 100,000, enabling analysis of entire books or lengthy conversations in a single prompt.

Key architectural innovations driving evolution

Several fundamental architectural innovations have driven the evolution of transformer models:

Attention mechanism refinements

From the original scaled dot-product attention to more efficient variants like grouped-query attention and multi-query attention, refinements to the core attention mechanism have improved both computational efficiency and model capabilities.

Positional encoding advances

Early transformers used fixed sinusoidal positional encodings, but more sophisticated approaches have emerged:

  • Learned positional embeddings
  • Rotary positional embeddings (RoPE)
  • Alibi positional biases
  • Position interpolation for extending context windows

These advances have been crucial for improving how transformers handle sequence information and extending context lengths.

Normalization strategies

Various approaches to normalization have improved training stability and performance:

  • Layer normalization positioning (Pre-LN vs. Post-LN)
  • RMSNorm as a more efficient alternative
  • Normalization-free architectures

Activation functions

Beyond the original ReLU, newer activation functions have improved performance:

  • GELU (Gaussian Error Linear Unit)
  • SwiGLU and variants
  • SiLU (Sigmoid Linear Unit)

Architectural blocks beyond attention

Models have incorporated specialized components for specific capabilities:

  • Gated feed-forward networks
  • Expert layers in MoE architectures
  • Specialized memory mechanisms

Training methodology evolution

Alongside architectural changes, training methodologies have evolved significantly:

Data curation and filtering

As researchers recognized the critical importance of data quality, more sophisticated approaches to dataset curation emerged:

  • Removing duplicated content
  • Filtering for quality and reliability
  • Balancing different data sources
  • Decontamination procedures for benchmark data

Training objectives beyond MLM

New pre-training objectives have improved model capabilities:

  • Replaced token detection
  • Span corruption
  • Contrastive learning objectives
  • Prefix language modeling

Optimization techniques

Advances in optimization have enabled training of ever-larger models:

  • Improved optimizers like AdamW, Lion, and Sophia
  • Gradient accumulation for large batch training
  • Mixed-precision training
  • ZeRO optimizer for distributed training

The state of modern LLMs

Today’s leading transformer-based LLMs demonstrate capabilities that would have seemed impossible just a few years ago:

Emergent abilities

Modern LLMs exhibit numerous emergent capabilities not explicitly designed into their architecture:

  • Chain-of-thought reasoning
  • Self-correction and reflection
  • Tool use and planning
  • In-context learning
  • Translation between programming languages

Multimodal integration

The latest models seamlessly integrate multiple modalities:

  • Text-to-image generation and understanding
  • Document analysis with text and visual elements
  • Code with both natural language and programming syntax
  • Mathematical notation and reasoning

Tool use and augmentation

Modern LLMs can be augmented with external capabilities:

  • Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG)
  • Function calling to external APIs
  • Integration with specialized tools
  • Agent frameworks for complex task solving

Challenges and future directions

Despite their remarkable progress, transformer-based models still face significant challenges:

Computational efficiency

The computational resources required for cutting-edge models remain enormous:

  • Training GPT-4 sized models costs tens or hundreds of millions of dollars
  • Inference costs limit widespread deployment
  • Environmental impacts of large-scale AI training

Research in sparse models, distillation, and more efficient architectures aims to address these challenges.

Reasoning limitations

Even the most advanced LLMs still struggle with:

  • Complex multi-step reasoning
  • Logical consistency over long outputs
  • Mathematical problem-solving beyond pattern matching
  • Avoiding hallucinations and factual errors

Context window constraints

While context windows have grown dramatically, models still struggle with:

  • Effectively utilizing information across very long contexts
  • Maintaining coherence in long-form generation
  • True document understanding rather than pattern completion

Alignment and safety

As models become more powerful, ensuring they remain aligned with human values becomes increasingly challenging:

  • Preventing harmful outputs
  • Reducing subtle biases
  • Maintaining helpfulness while avoiding manipulation
  • Handling ambiguous instructions appropriately

The road ahead

Looking forward, several promising directions may shape the continued evolution of transformer models:

Architectural innovations

  • Hybrid architectures combining transformers with other approaches
  • State space models as alternatives to attention
  • More sophisticated mixture of experts implementations
  • Memory-augmented transformers for enhanced reasoning

Training paradigms

  • Continued scaling with improved efficiency
  • Reinforcement learning from diverse feedback sources
  • Curriculum learning for complex capabilities
  • Self-supervised fine-tuning approaches

Multimodal expansion

  • Integration of additional modalities beyond text and images
  • Improved reasoning across modalities
  • Video understanding and generation
  • 3D scene comprehension

Specialized domains

  • Scientific research assistants with domain-specific knowledge
  • Code generation that guarantees correctness
  • Mathematical assistants with formal verification
  • Creative partners for various artistic domains

Conclusion

The evolution from BERT to today’s sophisticated LLMs represents one of the most rapid and consequential technological progressions in modern history. In just six years, transformer-based models have evolved from specialized NLP tools to general-purpose AI systems with capabilities approaching human-level performance across many domains.

This evolution has been driven by a combination of architectural innovations, scaling laws, training methodology improvements, and conceptual breakthroughs. From BERT’s bidirectional encoding to GPT’s massive scaling, from efficiency-focused variants to multimodal integration, each step has built upon previous work while opening new possibilities.

As transformers continue to evolve, they promise to reshape numerous fields and enable capabilities previously relegated to science fiction. Understanding this remarkable trajectory helps us appreciate both how far we’ve come and the exciting frontiers that still lie ahead in the ongoing development of transformer-based AI systems.